Most organizations might be solving the wrong AI problem

Most organizations might be solving the wrong AI problem. They're obsessing over crafting perfect prompts when the real challenge is systematically connecting AI to their business knowledge. This shift toward "context engineering" represents a fundamental change in how enterprises approach AI implementation.
Context engineering goes beyond prompt optimization---it's the systematic design of how business information flows to AI systems. You can think of it this way: if prompt engineering is becoming better at asking questions, context engineering is ensuring AI already understands your business before you even ask.
The Business Knowledge Integration Challenge:
The fundamental challenge becomes clear in practice: AI models excel at processing information, but they struggle when that information exists in organizational silos. The Palmer Group recently implemented context engineering for a financial services client. By connecting market data, client portfolios, regulatory requirements, and relationship history, their advisors now receive AI-generated insights that would have previously required hours of cross-functional meetings to compile. The result? 40% reduction in prep time and more personalized client strategies.
Cross-functional Collaboration Requirement:
Context engineering requires unprecedented collaboration between business units (who own the context) and IT (who own the infrastructure). This isn't about technology implementation---it's about information architecture. The firms that succeed are those that can systematically identify which knowledge matters for decision-making and structure it so AI can meaningfully contribute to business processes.
Sustainable Competitive Advantage Creation:
Unlike prompts, which are easily copied, well-designed context engineering creates organization-specific advantage that deepens over time. When AI understands your operations, clients, and market dynamics, it becomes a strategic asset rather than a generic tool. Enterprise implementations show measurable results: Microsoft's AI code helpers with architectural and organizational context delivered a 26% increase in completed software tasks, while retailers report 10x improvements in personalized offer success rates after deploying context-engineered agents.
Context engineering illustrates a broader principle about AI's competitive potential: the greatest opportunities may not require waiting for the next technological breakthrough. With today's capabilities, organizations have barely scratched the surface of what's possible through systematic execution. The competitive advantage may not lie in accessing the most advanced models, but in building organizational capability to make AI truly understand your business.
How strategically does your organization think about information architecture as a competitive advantage?
Marko Paananen
Strategic AI consultant and digital business development expert with 20+ years of experience. Helps companies turn AI potential into measurable business value.
Follow on LinkedIn →Related Insights

Shadow AI: Three Critical Risks Organizations Face
Employees increasingly share sensitive data with AI tools using personal accounts, creating governance and security challenges.

Autonomous AI Agents: Benefits and Hidden Risks
Autonomous AI agents are shifting work from task iteration to goal definition and evaluation. The risk: convincing but shallow output may flood decision-making.

What 700 Million ChatGPT Users Actually Do with AI - And What It Reveals About Workplace Strategies
OpenAI's study with Harvard and Duke analyzed 1.5M ChatGPT messages. Results show AI is valued more for decision support than automation—what does this mean for workplace strategy?
Interested in learning more?
Contact us to discuss your company's AI strategy.